Crew sizes and roles for events from 50 to 5,000 attendees — which jobs are real jobs, which can be combined, and the ratios that decide queue length at the door.
"How many people do we need?" is usually answered with a number that is too low, because the plan counts the desk and forgets everything that happens away from it.
At fifty people, one person may hold four of those. At five thousand, each is a team. What does not change is that the event lead has to be free to answer questions, and the moment they are behind a desk, the event has no lead.
Registration is where crowding is visible. As a working rule for an on-site check-in with scanning:
Five hundred people arriving across an hour therefore wants about four stations, one floater and a printer — six people for forty-five minutes, not two for three hours. The full method is in getting 500 people in under 30 minutes, and self check-in kiosks change these numbers if your data is clean.
They can do anything with a clear script and a named supervisor: doors, wayfinding, queue management, room counts. They should not be the only person who can solve a payment problem or open a locked room. Brief them in person, give them one page, and tell them explicitly what to escalate rather than improvise.
Staff follow the crowd, not the clock. Look at last year's check-in timestamps: most events have a sharp peak in the first ninety minutes and a long tail. Put your people in the peak, then move half of them to the floor. If you are running more than one day, the middle days need cover more than the first one does.
Most staffing pain is information pain: someone at a door who cannot see whether a person is registered, a liaison who does not know a session moved. When the attendee list, the agenda and the messaging are one system, a small crew covers a big event — that is what Gathervo is for. Try it free, or see the plans.
Continue the discussion around this blog post.
You must be logged in to participate in the discussion.
Login to CommentStart the conversation by leaving the first comment on this post.